Discusses evidence for an alternative account of Fénius’s role in the invention of the alphabet characterized by Isidorian influence, and suggests that Fénius’s increased prominence in the legend originates in the Middle Irish commentary tradition on Auraicept na n-éces.
vs. D. A. Binchy’s interpretation (in Ériu 12 (1938), pp. 78-134; cf. Best² 2175) of Bretha crólige §2 (as ed. by D. A. Binchy 1938; cf. Best² 2174); argues that this legal term maintained the same meaning throughout its textual history.
Discusses the role of male physical beauty in Irish literature, arguing that the elements and themes in the set description of the patron in classical verse derive from the duinedíglaim, or ‘personal profile’, of kings and heroes in early narrative literature.
From TCD MS H 3. 18. Includes poem (4qq.) Oidh ar huilleth n-oīsmentai, with a discussion of the metre aí ḟresligi; with English translation and notes. Cf. K. Meyer’s edition (in ZCP 7.304 [Best¹, p. 122]).
Pierre-Yves Lambert, in ÉtC 39 (2013), pp. 342-343.